tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-414482498098790205.post6634995968363574238..comments2007-08-16T06:15:09.304-06:00Ben Simohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11448600123169359955noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-414482498098790205.post-17599153299769795312007-08-16T06:15:00.000-06:002007-08-16T06:15:00.000-06:00Your page speaks about a very interesting subject. If you want to enter in my web is <A HREF="http://muestrarios.org" REL="nofollow">muestrarios.org</A><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://naruto-films.blogspot.com/" REL="nofollow">Naruto</A> fan.Davidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03563445408187463969noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-414482498098790205.post-1927471426338775682007-08-13T19:02:00.000-06:002007-08-13T19:02:00.000-06:00@ Mubbashir:<BR/><BR/>Thank you for reading.<BR/><BR/><BR/>@ Alan:<BR/><BR/>Lies appear more believable when they contain a hint of truth -- often pulled out of context. Others -- as you say -- are just plain stupid but still get some traction.<BR/><BR/>BenBen Simohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11448600123169359955noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-414482498098790205.post-16894384344090031122007-08-09T10:46:00.000-06:002007-08-09T10:46:00.000-06:00As I see it, your list of testing folklor is comprised almost entirely of half truths - or, it's almost like the "secret" game where you whisper something in someone's ear, then they whisper the same thing in someone else's ear, and so on, until the original whisper gets back to you and it has changed.<BR/><BR/>A few of the bits of folklore are just plain stupid and defy common sense. A few others are almost close. For example:<BR/><BR/>Most bugs occur at boundaries - no, <I>some</I> bugs occur at boundaries.<BR/><BR/>Good manual testing can be replaced by automation - no, <I>some</I> manual testing may be replaced by automation.<BR/><BR/>Testers need to have development skills - no, <I>some</I> testers on your team should probably have development skills - more importantly, a good portion of your test team should have some deep technical knowledge of the technology they are testing. If your product is an operating system or a development environment, you should probably have a lot of testers who know how to program. If your product is a bank teller UI, you should probably have some portion of the test team who deeply understand banking.<BR/><BR/>Uggh - folklore like this almost makes me embarrassed to be a tester.Alanhttp://blogs.msdn.com/alanpanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-414482498098790205.post-91313499770129752162007-08-08T18:32:00.000-06:002007-08-08T18:32:00.000-06:00Since i have subscribe your blog i am enjoying every single bit of it. Thanks for telling us things in such a interesting way. <BR/>Thanks for puling out things from your head to make them a part of ours.<BR/><BR/>--<BR/>Regards<BR/>MubbashirMubbashirhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06031017643925685357noreply@blogger.com